Of these, we looked more closely at ARMH and INTC
Excitingly different- fabless vs complete production/foundry
We found that although there's money to be made in both, we think
Intel (INTC) better suits the goals of CIG.
Trefis DCF Model
Calendar Year |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
Revenue ($ Bil) |
50.5 |
53.8 |
55.2 |
56.7 |
58.4 |
Adjusted EBITDA ($ Bil) |
26.1 |
27.8 |
28.6 |
29.4 |
30.1 |
Indirect Expenses ($ Bil) |
13.5 |
18.5 |
17.3 |
16.5 |
16.6 |
Discounted Cash Flows ($ Bil) |
|
8.92 |
9.70 |
9.99 |
9.53 |
Sum of DCFs = $151 B. Also taking into account $4.37B of debt, the Trefis valuation for Intel is $155B.With 5.09B shares outstanding, that is a price estimate of $30.52 per share.
Inspect this more closely here.
Investment Rationale
INTC has really strong moats.
INTC R&D Spending vs Competitors' Revenues
As you can see above, Intel's investments in R&D and capex exceed its main competitors' total revenues.
Future Growth
Future revenues depend on
- adoption of PCs in general
- success of Windows 8
- Laptops vs Desktops (evolution of ultrabooks subnotebooks)
- Server Market
- Ivy Bridge microarchitecture